What MCP is
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open protocol that standardises how AI clients discover and call tools, read resources, and request prompt templates from external servers. It was introduced by Anthropic in late 2024 and is now maintained as a working-group effort with an independent reference specification and a growing roster of client and server implementations. The protocol runs over JSON-RPC 2.0 and defines a small, deliberate surface: a client connects to a server, asks what capabilities the server offers, and from that point can call any advertised tool with structured arguments and receive structured results.
The thing MCP standardises is the shape of the contract
between an AI client and a tool-exposing server. Four
primitives are first-class: tools
(named, typed functions the client can invoke),
resources (addressable read-only content
the client can fetch), prompts
(parameterised prompt templates the client can request),
and sampling (a client-side capability
that lets the server ask the client to perform an LLM
completion on its behalf). The client learns what the
server supports with a single initialize
handshake and then tools/list,
resources/list, or
prompts/list calls — no
out-of-band documentation required.
MCP ships with multiple transport flavours. The two most common in practice are stdio, used when the server runs as a local subprocess of the client (the default for a Claude Desktop plugin or a Cursor extension server), and streamable-HTTP, used when the server lives on the network and clients connect to it over HTTP with optional server-sent-event streaming. An earlier HTTP-plus-SSE transport is still widely deployed and still a valid conforming option. The protocol-level contract — the JSON-RPC method names, the capability handshake, the tool-invocation shape — is identical across transports; only the framing differs. A client that can speak one transport can speak the others with a thin adapter.
The design intent is that MCP sits at the same level in the agent stack as HTTP does in the web stack: a lowest-common-denominator wire format that any model, any client, and any server can agree on without re-negotiating a bespoke tool-use convention per vendor. That intent matters because the alternative — every model vendor inventing its own tool-calling schema and every tool server shipping N adapters — is exactly the fragmentation MCP was designed to replace.
Why MCP matters for on-chain agents
On-chain agents already have good answers to two of the three questions a counterparty needs to resolve before trusting a call: who is this agent, and how do we settle payment for the call. ERC-8004 gives the agent a durable on-chain identity — a registered agentId with a resolvable card URI, a persistent reputation surface, and a stable identity across chains and tool invocations. x402 gives the call a per-request payment mechanism — an HTTP 402 response that carries a signed offer the client can satisfy with a standard-shaped on-chain payment. Both are solved layers.
What was not solved, before MCP, was the third
question: what tools does this agent expose, with
what argument shapes, and how do I call them? An
ERC-8004 agent card can list service endpoints by URL and
describe them in prose, but a client that wants to
program against those services still has to parse the
agent's documentation, hard-code the request shape, and
re-do that work for every new agent it discovers. MCP
fills that gap by giving the agent a machine-readable
tool catalog that any MCP-compliant client can
enumerate at runtime, with no out-of-band integration.
An AI client discovering an ERC-8004 agent for the first
time can resolve its MCP endpoint, call
tools/list, and
immediately see every tool the agent exposes with its full
typed input schema and expected output shape.
Put another way: ERC-8004 proves who an agent is, x402 settles how an agent gets paid, and MCP exposes what tools an agent can be asked to run. Together the three protocols close the loop between identity, invocation, and settlement — a counterparty agent can discover, call, pay, and verify the exchange without needing a vendor-specific SDK on either side. That is the composition that makes autonomous agent-to-agent commerce actually tractable on the open network, rather than something that only works inside a single vendor's walled garden.
Agent Zero's MCP server
Agent Zero exposes a live MCP server at a single remote endpoint:
-
https://api.onchainagentintel.io/mcp
The transport is streamable-HTTP — a network-reachable JSON-RPC endpoint that any MCP client with HTTP support can connect to without running a local subprocess. That is deliberate: the server is intended to be addressable from a laptop, from another agent's runtime, from a cloud notebook, or from a desktop MCP client with equal ease. There is no local install, no bundled binary, no OS-specific path — just an HTTP URL and the standard MCP handshake over it.
The server surface is a read-only slice of the live
Onchain Agent Intel catalog. Tools cover coverage counts,
leaderboard snapshots, per-agent summaries, and ecosystem
trending signals — enough for a counterparty agent to
answer "is this agent indexed, how is it scored, where
does it sit in the ecosystem" without needing a paid
subscription. The free surface is intentionally lossy
relative to the paid /v1/intel/*
catalog: it is good enough for discovery and triage, and
the deeper enriched views sit behind x402 on the paid
endpoints documented at agent.json.
The current tool roster — tool names, argument schemas,
and return shapes — is not restated on this page, because
the authoritative source is the live server itself. A
client that wants the current roster should either run a
tools/list call against
the endpoint above, or inspect the registry listing at
registry.modelcontextprotocol.io
where the server is published under the identifier
io.github.jsamp9/onchainagentintel.
Either path returns the live tool set; this page would
drift against the server the moment the catalog is
extended.
The server also carries an x402 upsell path. When a
client calls a free tool whose fuller companion view is
paid, the response includes a reference to the equivalent
paid /v1/intel/*
endpoint and the payment-option metadata the client would
need to settle for it via x402. The free MCP surface is
an invitation; the paid HTTP surface is where the deeper
data lives.
How to call Agent Zero's MCP server
The lowest-friction way to probe the server is a direct
JSON-RPC call. The tools/list
method is unauthenticated and returns the live tool
roster:
curl -s https://api.onchainagentintel.io/mcp \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/list","params":{}}'
The response is a standard MCP tools/list
result — an array of tool objects, each with a name,
description, and a JSON Schema for its input arguments.
From there, a tools/call
invocation names the tool and passes an
arguments object matching
that schema, and the server returns a structured content
payload. Both calls are plain JSON-RPC 2.0; there is no
MCP-specific framing to learn beyond the method names.
For an interactive MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue, or any other MCP-aware IDE), the client's configuration file takes a server entry naming the transport and the endpoint. The shape varies by client, but the generic streamable-HTTP form points at the same URL — for example, a configuration stanza of the shape:
{
"mcpServers": {
"onchainagentintel": {
"transport": "streamable-http",
"url": "https://api.onchainagentintel.io/mcp"
}
}
}
After the client reconnects, the Agent Zero tools appear alongside the client's other tool roster and can be invoked by the model in a conversation. Exact configuration-file paths and option names are documented per-client; the URL is the only Agent-Zero-specific field. No API key is required for the read-only tools.
Clients that want to call the paid
/v1/intel/* endpoints
directly rather than through MCP should see
/docs for the full
x402 flow, including
offer parsing, EIP-3009 authorization signing, and
settlement verification.
Discovery surfaces for MCP servers
An MCP client can only call a server it knows the URL of. The ecosystem has converged on a small set of registry and directory surfaces to solve that discovery problem. Agent Zero's MCP server is listed, or drafted-ready to be listed, across the main ones:
-
The official MCP registry at
registry.modelcontextprotocol.io. This is the canonical registry run by the MCP working group. Agent Zero's server is published there underio.github.jsamp9/onchainagentintelwith its endpoint URL, description, and a live tool list. A client that queries the registry resolves to the same URL this page documents. - PulseMCP. A community directory of production MCP servers with search, categorisation, and uptime indicators. Agent Zero's server is discoverable here under the on-chain / blockchain category.
- Smithery, Glama, mcp.so, mcpbundles, mcp-get. A set of third-party MCP server directories, each with its own curation style — some index everything in the official registry downstream, some curate manually, some offer additional metadata like installation recipes. Agent Zero carries listing packets drafted for each; the current listed-vs-pending state is tracked internally and the official registry remains the authoritative source for the live endpoint URL.
For a counterparty agent that wants to find Agent Zero's MCP server programmatically, the shortest path is a search against the official registry:
curl -s "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=onchainagentintel"
The response names the server, its endpoint URL, and everything an MCP client needs to connect. The published registry listing is intentionally the single source of truth for discovery; cross-listings on PulseMCP, Smithery, and the others are convenience aggregators that resolve to the same canonical entry.
For an agent that wants to be discoverable the
same way, the process is symmetric: publish an MCP
server at a stable HTTP URL, submit it to the official
registry with a verified GitHub (or domain) identity,
and let the downstream directories pick it up. The
registry's publication tooling (mcp-publisher)
handles the signing step; the ongoing cost is keeping
the server itself alive and the tool roster accurate.
Relation to ERC-8004, x402, and ERC-8183
ERC-8004 is the
identity layer. An agent registered under ERC-8004 has a
durable agentId, a resolvable card URI, and a reputation
surface that persists across tool invocations. MCP sits
on top of that: an ERC-8004 agent can declare its MCP
server endpoint on its agent card, giving any client
that resolves the card a direct path into the agent's
tool catalog. In Agent Zero's case, the agent card at
agent.json is the authoritative
declaration — the card lists the MCP endpoint alongside
the paid /v1/intel/*
services, so an MCP client discovering Agent Zero through
its ERC-8004 identity gets the MCP URL in the same
lookup.
x402 is the per-request
payment layer. MCP and x402 are composable but not
redundant: a free MCP tool call is a plain JSON-RPC
exchange, but a paid MCP tool call can respond with an
x402 offer the client satisfies before the server
returns the full result. In Agent Zero's current
deployment, the MCP surface is free and read-only, and
the paid surface sits on the HTTP
/v1/intel/* endpoints
that use x402 directly. The two surfaces are
intentionally split — the free MCP surface is for
discovery and triage, and the paid x402 surface is for
the deeper enriched data. Clients that want paid data
via MCP tooling can call the x402 endpoints through an
MCP-aware HTTP client; the two protocols compose
cleanly at the request level.
ERC-8183 is the atomic deliverable layer — the AgentCommerce on-chain job envelope for multi-step, receipt-anchored exchanges. MCP and ERC-8183 compose along a different axis: MCP exposes the tool surface a buyer can discover, and ERC-8183 is the envelope the buyer and seller settle inside when the deliverable is heavy enough to warrant a job record on-chain. A client that discovers an ERC-8183-capable agent via its MCP tool list can call an evaluation tool through MCP, pay via x402, and resolve the on-chain job record against the ERC-8183 contract — all four protocols stacking into a single agent-to-agent exchange with one identity, one discovery surface, one payment flow, and one atomic job envelope.
None of these four standards replaces any of the others. An open-network agent economy only works when identity, discovery, payment, and settlement all have interoperable primitives, and MCP is the piece that was missing from the on-chain story before.
Where to go next
For a developer trying to call Agent Zero through MCP or via the paid HTTP surface, the fastest path through the site is:
-
/docs. The
developer quickstart: agent.json schema, the public
stats endpoint, the x402 payment flow (including
EIP-3009 authorization), the Readiness methodology
reference, and every paid
/v1/intel/*endpoint with request / response examples. Start here if the goal is to call paid endpoints directly. - agent.json. The live manifest. Authoritative catalog of every service Agent Zero offers, every payment option, every endpoint URL. If anything on this page conflicts with the manifest, the manifest wins — this is a reference article, not a source of truth for live product state.
- /graph. The live agent payment graph. Useful for seeing which agents are counterparties to which, and for sanity-checking that the MCP tool surface is covering the ecosystem a client cares about.
- /data. The citable dataset index. Published datasets for research use with stable citation URLs — useful when writing about Agent Zero's coverage rather than calling the live API.
-
/services.
The human-readable catalog of paid
/v1/*endpoints with their current prices and payment options.
For a developer running a client that will consume MCP servers more generally, the specification is the primary reference — the MCP working group publishes the protocol as an open spec with transport details, method shapes, and conformance guidance that any client or server implementation must honor.
See also
ERC-8004 explained · x402 explained · ERC-8183 explained · ERC-4337 explained · ERC-8257 explained · Protocols compared · Glossary · Developer docs · Services catalog · /data (published datasets) · Agent graph · agent.json (authoritative live manifest)